Wichita State's independent, student-run news source

The Sunflower

Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

The+Sunflower
The Sunflower

The Sunflower

The Sunflower

Advertisement

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Students aren’t the only members of the university demanding transparency.

Earlier this month The Sunflower received a letter in an unmarked envelope titled “Concerns of the Faculty regarding the governance and future of Wichita State University.” Members of Faculty Senate Wednesday confirmed the letter, which outlines faculty grievances with the administration, had been sent to President John Bardo.

The letter states faculty concerns that “the idea of shared governance is a concept that has fallen into disrepair under the current administration” and that there is “a perception that only part of the university is being involved in the future direction of the institution while the rest is left to fend for itself.”

Decision-making processes remain “murky” and input from faculty is “often non-existent.” Efforts to communicate to faculty are “superficial at best and patronizing at worst.”

“At a fundamental level, there is a profound lack of transparency and a frequent resort to unilateralism by the administration which is a main concern among the faculty at WSU,” the letter states.

“Colleges, departments and units are being asked to make ‘big and audacious goals’ and to ‘break out of silos’ and to be ‘innovative’ and ‘creative’ but are asked to do so with no guidance,” the letter continues.

When faculty do attempt to meet these goals set by Bardo’s administration, the letter says, “those plans are given token acknowledgment and laid aside for the next new administrative pet project.”

The letter acknowledges the reality of the statewide budget crunch, but questions why money always seems to appear “for projects the administration deems important, such as paying consultants, but not others.”

Policies change without faculty input, the letter says. Syllabus changes are mandated without discussion. “The administration consistently declares these non-negotiable with no faculty input, only compliance. In these situations, the veneer of shared governance shatters.”

The letter uses Innovation Campus as a major example of an administrative decision that took place without any input from the faculty.

“Faculty are not necessarily opposed to the project but we are concerned about the lack of transparency in how the decisions regarding its development are made.”

Another major decision, according to the letter, that when forward with “limited discussion and input” included the WATC-WSU merger, and the changes it underwent over time.

“Now that it looks like WATC will simply be a satellite (for what purposes remains entirely unclear), all the time and energy put into it could have been saved if a thorough going discussion of the issues had been presented earlier on before any moves to merge were made,” the letter went on.

Faculty salaries, especially in relation to administrator salaries, were another major concern of the faculty in the letter.

“We are especially concerned that the number of administrators has been growing over the years while the number of faculty lines are being cut. At a time when money is tight, continually adding six-figure salaried administrators seems to be poor asset management.”

“Realizing that different budget streams have different restrictions, the truth, nevertheless, is that resources are continually made available to address priorities: the Innovation Campus, WATC, parking, sports, and Shocker One Stop, and expansion of upper administration in terms of both numbers and individual compensation. The message is clear: if you are a priority of the administration, then resources become available. Faculty are clearly not a priority.”

The conclusion of the letter, which is four pages in length, outlines a way forward, one that “treats faculty and staff as partners in the process whose concerns will be heard and whose concerns may shape or even stop a proposed project, goal, or endeavor. … We hope this time of challenge can also be one that launches a new way of doing things.”

The administration responded to the letter by creating an online page called “President Bardo’s Q/A.”

“The purpose of this online format is twofold: give faculty access to in-depth responses and allow administration to fully address the faculty questions and concerns,” the page, which is maintained by Strategic Communications, says.

On the page, the president’s executive team addresses questions submitted by faculty members, including some of the issues in the letter. On Wednesday, there were 13 total question answered and signed by 10 different administrators. None of the questions were answered or signed by President Bardo.

5 Comments

5 Responses to “Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo”

  1. Real Shocker on March 16th, 2017 3:54 pm

    Post the entire letter as a link in this story like you did the BKD report.

    [Reply]

  2. Real Shocker on March 16th, 2017 3:56 pm

    What is the Q&A web page link?

    [Reply]

  3. Real Shocker on March 16th, 2017 4:35 pm

    Here is the link to the Q&A page.

    http://webs.wichita.edu/?u=quinn&p=/faq_faculty_president/

    Time for some fact checking.

    Did the President receive a pay raise recenlty?
    Lou, list the salary of record for each of the past two years. In 2015 Bardo’s salary was $350,000 and the Regents gave a 2% raise to him. He said he would give it to something. In 2016 the Eagle listed his base pay as $357,000. The pay increase in 2015 was a base increase and not a one time deal and that is how it was $357,000 in 2016. Is the Eagle story from June 2016 wrong stating his base pay was $357,000?

    Article with $350,000 pay in June 2015
    http://www.kansas.com/news/local/article25177030.html

    Article with $357,000 pay in June 2016
    http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article84404892.html

    This Sunflower article has Bardo at $367,000?
    http://thesunflower.com/568/news/amid-budget-cuts-administrators-salaries-swell/

    Have some administrators received large pay increases?
    Werner, list the annual salaries for Andy Schlapp and John Tomblin from 2012 until now. What increased in job responsibilities?
    Here is the Sunflower article again. Goodness.
    http://thesunflower.com/568/news/amid-budget-cuts-administrators-salaries-swell/

    Have administrators leaving positions gone back to regular salary?
    Toni, What about Peter Cohen? David McDonald? Go back to 2012. Does Keith Pickus count? Is he paid from Academic Affairs and not the Foundation? List pre and post Bardo.

    How many consultants have been hired in the past 5 years?
    Werner and Lois, The Royall “all-in” costs are about $1,000,000 annually. The fee you list is paid directly to them. The added cost of ACT name purchases, additional postage, and increased number of publications to mail to Royall & Company name purchases for the increased number of names purchased is charged directly to WSU and not paid to Royall & Company. The Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for the program pushes $1,000,000 per year.

    What about the Pappas Consulting firm headed by Alceste Pappas who is a very good friend of John Bardo that he used at several past schools where he worked. John Bardo personally wrote the RFQ that retained the Pappas Consultants 2012-2013. Isn’t that within 5 years? Total cost for Admissions and Information Technology consulting was about $685,000 (about $535,000 for Admissions and about $150,000 for IT) or so before then General Counsel, Ted Ayres, put a stop to it.

    Why haven’t faculty been used for research?
    Werner, how much was paid to The Research Partnership (TRP) and Bob Ross annually before and after Bardo came?

    People without the background don’t know for sure what the detail is and what to ask.

    [Reply]

  4. Real Shocker on March 16th, 2017 4:42 pm

    Please share these additional details with Faculty Senate so they can note the initial response given and the additional details.

    [Reply]

  5. Aw...WSU hates women on April 25th, 2017 1:10 am

    It has been 40 days since you wrote this article and still only 13 or 14 questions answered… that was a really cheap cop out.

    [Reply]

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Campus

    Christine Schneikart-Luebbe honored — questions remain

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Best of Wichita

    Best of Wichita: Saul gravy at Doo-Dah Diner

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    News

    Linnabary accepts SGA nomination, no longer with The Sunflower

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Campus

    Female allegedly sexually assaulted by 2 males on WSU campus

  • Campus

    Two killed, two hurt in Oklahoma crash

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Columns

    SGA Debates: A disappoinment

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Campus

    Azad reinstated as student body vice president, suspension lifted

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Campus

    WATC affiliation document presented to faculty senate

  • Faculty Senate letter confirmed, sent to President Bardo

    Campus

    The Revolving Door

  • Campus

    How Student Senate voted on the YMCA fees increase