A Kansas news operation has raised concerns of academic misconduct against Wichita State University’s President Richard Muma, who has denied the claims, calling them “deeply personal.”
On Monday morning, the Kansas Reflector reported that Muma’s 20-year-old doctoral dissertation lacked attributions for other authors’ work.
Muma wrote his dissertation and completed his doctorate from the University of Missouri-St. Louis in 2004. During this time, he was the chair and a professor in the public health sciences and physician assistant departments at WSU.
In some areas of his dissertation, Muma has text repeated verbatim from other books or journals without the use of quotation marks, according to the Reflector’s story.
In a university release Monday morning, Muma said he learned of the allegations a month ago, saying that the reporter he spoke to “refused to share specific allegations until publishing his article today.”
“To be clear, I attributed and cited all sources in my dissertation, and I have complete confidence in the integrity and originality of my research,” Muma said in a university statement Monday morning, hours after the Reflector article. “These are technical oversights where text was reused, and those attributions did not have quotation marks, and I am taking steps to make corrections.”
In light of the allegations, the president said he called for the university to conduct an inquiry to weigh the validity of the claims.
Shirley Lefever, who serves as the provost of the university, conducted the inquiry with the help of the university’s research officer John Tomblin, according to the statement from Muma. The review also had an external section, with a “leading expert in plagiarism.” Muma said the expert is unaffiliated with the university.
Muma said he was told that “less than 5%” of the dissertation contained text with “technical omissions.”
Muma’s dissertation is 88 pages long, meaning that nearly five pages lacked proper attribution, according to the provost’s inquiry.
“The facts led to a determination that these were technical omissions that did not rise to the level of misconduct, and the matter was closed,” Muma said.
The Kansas Board of Regents handles employment decisions related to university presidents in Kansas.
In an email to The Sunflower, Matt Keith, KBOR communications director, reiterated Muma’s message.
“As (Muma) noted, an independent review conducted by an expert concluded that there was no academic misconduct in his doctoral dissertation. We have no further comment,” Keith wrote on the behalf of himself and KBOR President Blake Flanders.
Muma has not responded to The Sunflower’s request for an interview as of Monday afternoon.
Reporting gathered by the Kansas Reflector can be found here.
Anonymous • Oct 9, 2024 at 6:47 pm
This disgraceful situation is NOT a technical oversight as Muma would want us to believe. If someone fails to use quotation marks when directly quoting another source, even if they included in-text citations, they are basically misrepresenting the original author’s words as their own. I read Muma’s dissertation, and if he had originally used quotation marks it would have demonstrated that a SIGNIFICANT amount of his paper was comprised of content from other authors – this would have raised a red flag about the originality of his paper! Could that be why he failed to use quotation marks? Doctoral dissertations are expected to demonstrate ORIGINAL thought and critical analysis. A dissertation is NOT supposed to be a compilation of others’ ideas. It is a violation of proper academic conduct if a large portion of one’s paper is basically just slapping down quotes from other sources. A doctoral dissertation needs original content that provides a unique perspective on already existing research. Wichita State must not sweep this issue under the rug because the university’s integrity is at stake! Administrators must be held to the same standard that it holds us students to regarding the issue of plagiarism.
Anonymous • Oct 8, 2024 at 2:20 pm
Clearly Mr Muma lied
You cannot have 2 people employed by Wichita State University do a review of the paper and clear Mr Muma.
Mr Muma clearly plagiarized this paper and should be IMMEDIATELY TERMINATED